<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improve your Email Marketing with Outstanding Follow-Up in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bskconsulting.com/2009/01/improve-your-email-marketing-with-outstanding-follow-up-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bskconsulting.com/2009/01/improve-your-email-marketing-with-outstanding-follow-up-in-2009/</link>
	<description>Brad Kleinman...Engineer, Entrepreneur, Educator.  Nice guy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:44:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Cool</title>
		<link>http://bskconsulting.com/2009/01/improve-your-email-marketing-with-outstanding-follow-up-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bskconsulting.com/?p=251#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Brad,
These are great pre-mailing and follow-up techniques. Direct mail never stood on just one mailing alone and the same is true for e-mail. I&#039;d also remind people that 20-40% is a great open rate. If we think back to direct snail mail, where 1% purchasing was a good response (in some industries) we remember that 1% buying often came from less than  20% opening. We couldn&#039;t track who opened the envelope, but we knew that even carefully targeted mailings often went directly to the trash. 

I&#039;d add to this that we need to target our e-mail as precisely as our snail mail. Though we&#039;re not paying for postage, we may in some cases be paying for lists so we need to ensure that we&#039;re reaching the right people. 

Then we must also pay attention to our &quot;from&quot; and &quot;subject&quot; lines. 

This fall I almost pitched an e-mail send from an individual I didn&#039;t know with a subject line &quot;Oktoberfest.&quot; For some reason I opened it anyway. It turned out that I was a member of the association hosting the event, I just couldn&#039;t tell that until I&#039;d opened the e-mail. If the from field had not been this unknown person, but instead XYZ org, I would have known right away. The same goes for the subject line. It should have said something like &quot;Join us for the XYX annual Oktoberfest.&quot;

These fields are like the printing on an envelope, we have just a few spots to show them what the mail is about and entice them to open it. If we don&#039;t give them a hint, a reason to open, they won&#039;t. But if we take the care with our &quot;from&quot; and &quot;subject&quot; fields that we do with our email copy, it can make a world of difference. And, of course, once we get them to open the e-mail we should make sure it is &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.case.edu/webdev/2008/12/09/email.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;formatted correctly&lt;/a&gt; so that everyone has a chance to read the message we&#039;ve so carefully crafted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,<br />
These are great pre-mailing and follow-up techniques. Direct mail never stood on just one mailing alone and the same is true for e-mail. I&#8217;d also remind people that 20-40% is a great open rate. If we think back to direct snail mail, where 1% purchasing was a good response (in some industries) we remember that 1% buying often came from less than  20% opening. We couldn&#8217;t track who opened the envelope, but we knew that even carefully targeted mailings often went directly to the trash. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d add to this that we need to target our e-mail as precisely as our snail mail. Though we&#8217;re not paying for postage, we may in some cases be paying for lists so we need to ensure that we&#8217;re reaching the right people. </p>
<p>Then we must also pay attention to our &#8220;from&#8221; and &#8220;subject&#8221; lines. </p>
<p>This fall I almost pitched an e-mail send from an individual I didn&#8217;t know with a subject line &#8220;Oktoberfest.&#8221; For some reason I opened it anyway. It turned out that I was a member of the association hosting the event, I just couldn&#8217;t tell that until I&#8217;d opened the e-mail. If the from field had not been this unknown person, but instead XYZ org, I would have known right away. The same goes for the subject line. It should have said something like &#8220;Join us for the XYX annual Oktoberfest.&#8221;</p>
<p>These fields are like the printing on an envelope, we have just a few spots to show them what the mail is about and entice them to open it. If we don&#8217;t give them a hint, a reason to open, they won&#8217;t. But if we take the care with our &#8220;from&#8221; and &#8220;subject&#8221; fields that we do with our email copy, it can make a world of difference. And, of course, once we get them to open the e-mail we should make sure it is <a href="http://blog.case.edu/webdev/2008/12/09/email.html" rel="nofollow">formatted correctly</a> so that everyone has a chance to read the message we&#8217;ve so carefully crafted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

